<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Weil Tax BLOG - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://tax.weil.com/category/uk-tax/interpretation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://tax.weil.com/category/uk-tax/interpretation/</link>
        <description>Views and developments from the Tax Department at Weil</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2017 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=483</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The Upper Tribunal has overturned the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in McQuillan v HMRC, finding that non-dividend bearing redeemable shares constituted ordinary share capital for the purposes of section 989 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (section 989) ([2017] UKUT 344 (TCC)) (see Focus “Ordinary share capital: can a negative prove a positive?”, www.practicallaw.com/2-631-2725).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/">Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Upper Tribunal has overturned the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in McQuillan v HMRC, finding that non-dividend bearing redeemable shares constituted ordinary share capital for the purposes of section 989 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (section 989) ([2017] UKUT 344 (TCC)) (see Focus “Ordinary share capital: can a negative prove a positive?”, www.practicallaw.com/2-631-2725).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/">Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Weil on the Move – Episode 2 – QCB or Non-QCB: That is the Question</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/weil-on-the-move-episode-2-qcb-or-non-qcb-that-is-the-question/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=481</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent U.K. Court of Appeal decision in Hancock v HMRC raises the interesting (and important) question of the U.K. tax treatment of reorganizations involving qualifying corporate bonds (QCBs) and non-qualifying corporate bonds (non-QCBs). Although often thought of as one of the more certain areas of personal taxation, the Hancock decision has thrown some doubt</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/weil-on-the-move-episode-2-qcb-or-non-qcb-that-is-the-question/">Weil on the Move – Episode 2 – QCB or Non-QCB: That is the Question</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent U.K. Court of Appeal decision in Hancock v HMRC raises the interesting (and important) question of the U.K. tax treatment of reorganizations involving qualifying corporate bonds (QCBs) and non-qualifying corporate bonds (non-QCBs). Although often thought of as one of the more certain areas of personal taxation, the Hancock decision has thrown some doubt</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/weil-on-the-move-episode-2-qcb-or-non-qcb-that-is-the-question/">Weil on the Move – Episode 2 – QCB or Non-QCB: That is the Question</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Two Types of Bond</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/two-types-of-bond/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=479</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>It is often lamented that the advance of texting and social media has led to the unfortunate proliferation of acronyms and abbreviations that now haunt our daily lives. However, tax practitioners are no strangers to this phenomenon: the tax regime is littered with cumbersome terms that have long been subject to abbreviation and are thrown</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/two-types-of-bond/">Two Types of Bond</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is often lamented that the advance of texting and social media has led to the unfortunate proliferation of acronyms and abbreviations that now haunt our daily lives. However, tax practitioners are no strangers to this phenomenon: the tax regime is littered with cumbersome terms that have long been subject to abbreviation and are thrown</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/two-types-of-bond/">Two Types of Bond</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=465</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent decision in McQuillan v HMRC highlights the challenges faced by taxpayers seeking to apply correctly those parts of the UK tax code that require interpretation in the absence of conclusive definition ([2016] UKFTT 305 (TC)). McQuillan addresses whether shares with no dividend rights can be said to carry a fixed rate of dividend</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/">Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent decision in McQuillan v HMRC highlights the challenges faced by taxpayers seeking to apply correctly those parts of the UK tax code that require interpretation in the absence of conclusive definition ([2016] UKFTT 305 (TC)). McQuillan addresses whether shares with no dividend rights can be said to carry a fixed rate of dividend</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/">Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>