<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Weil Tax BLOG - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://tax.weil.com/category/uk-tax/er/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://tax.weil.com/category/uk-tax/er/</link>
        <description>Views and developments from the Tax Department at Weil</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2017 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=483</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The Upper Tribunal has overturned the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in McQuillan v HMRC, finding that non-dividend bearing redeemable shares constituted ordinary share capital for the purposes of section 989 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (section 989) ([2017] UKUT 344 (TCC)) (see Focus “Ordinary share capital: can a negative prove a positive?”, www.practicallaw.com/2-631-2725).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/">Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Upper Tribunal has overturned the decision of the First-tier Tribunal in McQuillan v HMRC, finding that non-dividend bearing redeemable shares constituted ordinary share capital for the purposes of section 989 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (section 989) ([2017] UKUT 344 (TCC)) (see Focus “Ordinary share capital: can a negative prove a positive?”, www.practicallaw.com/2-631-2725).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/uk-focus-latest-thinking/ordinary-share-capital-clarity-in-relation-to-dividend-rights/">Ordinary Share Capital: Clarity in Relation to Dividend Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Oliver Walker</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart Pibworth</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tax.weil.com/?p=465</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent decision in McQuillan v HMRC highlights the challenges faced by taxpayers seeking to apply correctly those parts of the UK tax code that require interpretation in the absence of conclusive definition ([2016] UKFTT 305 (TC)). McQuillan addresses whether shares with no dividend rights can be said to carry a fixed rate of dividend</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/">Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent decision in McQuillan v HMRC highlights the challenges faced by taxpayers seeking to apply correctly those parts of the UK tax code that require interpretation in the absence of conclusive definition ([2016] UKFTT 305 (TC)). McQuillan addresses whether shares with no dividend rights can be said to carry a fixed rate of dividend</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/uk-tax/straight-to-the-point/ordinary-share-capital-can-a-negative-prove-a-positive/">Ordinary Share Capital: Can a Negative Prove a Positive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>