<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>Weil Tax BLOG - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://tax.weil.com/category/tax-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://tax.weil.com/category/tax-reform/</link>
        <description>Views and developments from the Tax Department at Weil</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
                                        <item>
                        <title>Carried Interest: UK Tax Reform</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/carried-interest/carried-interest-uk-tax-reform/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 10:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Aron Joy</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2362</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>On 30 October 2024, the Chancellor delivered the Autumn Budget which included an announcement on the highly anticipated changes to the taxation of carried interest in the UK. The scope and scale of this potential overhaul have been a topic of intense debate since the Labour Party&#8217;s 2024 General Election manifesto pledged to “close the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/carried-interest/carried-interest-uk-tax-reform/">Carried Interest: UK Tax Reform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 30 October 2024, the Chancellor delivered the Autumn Budget which included an announcement on the highly anticipated changes to the taxation of carried interest in the UK. The scope and scale of this potential overhaul have been a topic of intense debate since the Labour Party&#8217;s 2024 General Election manifesto pledged to “close the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/carried-interest/carried-interest-uk-tax-reform/">Carried Interest: UK Tax Reform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>New IRS Proposed Regulations Address Dual Consolidated Loss Rules</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/features/new-irs-proposed-regulations-address-dual-consolidated-loss-rules/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Madeline Joerg</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Sydnei Jones</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2286</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[On August 6, 2024, the Treasury Department (“Treasury”) issued Proposed Regulations (REG- 102144-04) (the “Proposed Regulations”) regarding section 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, the Proposed Regulations clarify the application of the existing dual consolidated loss (“DCL”) rules by providing guidance regarding: (i) the interplay of the DCL rules with the intercompany transaction regulations under section 1502, (ii) the computation of income or DCLs, (iii) the application of certain anti-avoidance rules, (iv) the interplay of the DCL rules with the GLoBE Model rules, and (v) the treatment of disregarded payment losses.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 6, 2024, the Treasury Department (“Treasury”) issued Proposed Regulations (REG- 102144-04) (the “Proposed Regulations”) regarding section 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, the Proposed Regulations clarify the application of the existing dual consolidated loss (“DCL”) rules by providing guidance regarding: (i) the interplay of the DCL rules with the intercompany transaction regulations</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/features/new-irs-proposed-regulations-address-dual-consolidated-loss-rules/">New IRS Proposed Regulations Address Dual Consolidated Loss Rules</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Final Regulations: Guidance on Reporting and Payment of Excise Tax</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/final-regulations-guidance-on-reporting-and-payment-of-excise-tax/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Joseph Pari</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Grant Solomon</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2266</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>On June 28, 2024, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) released final regulations (T.D. 10002) (the “Final Regulations”) that provide guidance applicable to the reporting and payment of the excise tax under section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), on repurchases of</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/final-regulations-guidance-on-reporting-and-payment-of-excise-tax/">Final Regulations: Guidance on Reporting and Payment of Excise Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 28, 2024, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) released final regulations (T.D. 10002) (the “Final Regulations”) that provide guidance applicable to the reporting and payment of the excise tax under section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), on repurchases of</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/final-regulations-guidance-on-reporting-and-payment-of-excise-tax/">Final Regulations: Guidance on Reporting and Payment of Excise Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Clear as Mud – Chevron Irreverence and Tax Law</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/clear-as-mud-chevron-irreverence-and-tax-law/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Joseph Pari</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Grant Solomon</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2264</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the Court’s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and held that federal agency interpretations of law are not entitled to any deference (such as the deference provided to the Department</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/clear-as-mud-chevron-irreverence-and-tax-law/">Clear as Mud – Chevron Irreverence and Tax Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the Court’s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and held that federal agency interpretations of law are not entitled to any deference (such as the deference provided to the Department</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/clear-as-mud-chevron-irreverence-and-tax-law/">Clear as Mud – Chevron Irreverence and Tax Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Supreme Court Abolishes Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/supreme-court-abolishes-judicial-deference-to-agency-interpretations-of-law/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Mark Perry</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Josh Wesneski</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Max Bloom</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2259</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, in a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the Court’s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and held that agency interpretations of law are not entitled to any deference. By overruling what is known as “Chevron deference,”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/supreme-court-abolishes-judicial-deference-to-agency-interpretations-of-law/">Supreme Court Abolishes Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, in a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the Court’s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and held that agency interpretations of law are not entitled to any deference. By overruling what is known as “Chevron deference,”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/supreme-court-abolishes-judicial-deference-to-agency-interpretations-of-law/">Supreme Court Abolishes Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Proposed Treasury Regulations Update Tax Standards for Bad Debt Deductions by Regulated Financial Companies</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/proposed-treasury-regulations-update-tax-standards-for-bad-debt-deductions-by-regulated-financial-companies/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Joseph Pari</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Stuart J. Goldring</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Alfonso Dulcey</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Renan Rodriguez</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2096</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>On December 28, 2023, the U.S. Treasury Department (&#8220;Treasury&#8220;) and the Internal Revenue Service (&#8220;IRS&#8220;) issued proposed regulations (REG-121010-17) updating the standards for when a debt instrument held by a regulated financial company or a member of a regulated financial company group will be conclusively presumed to be worthless for U.S. federal income tax purposes</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/proposed-treasury-regulations-update-tax-standards-for-bad-debt-deductions-by-regulated-financial-companies/">Proposed Treasury Regulations Update Tax Standards for Bad Debt Deductions by Regulated Financial Companies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 28, 2023, the U.S. Treasury Department (&#8220;Treasury&#8220;) and the Internal Revenue Service (&#8220;IRS&#8220;) issued proposed regulations (REG-121010-17) updating the standards for when a debt instrument held by a regulated financial company or a member of a regulated financial company group will be conclusively presumed to be worthless for U.S. federal income tax purposes</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/proposed-treasury-regulations-update-tax-standards-for-bad-debt-deductions-by-regulated-financial-companies/">Proposed Treasury Regulations Update Tax Standards for Bad Debt Deductions by Regulated Financial Companies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight Series: Tax Implications of New Rules Under the Advisers Act</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/features/chambers-expert-focus-weil-tax-insight-series-tax-implications-of-new-rules-under-the-advisers-act/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Robert Frastai</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Andrew Morris</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=2021</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[In this edition of the Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight Series, Weil Tax partners Robert Frastai and Andrew Morris discuss the impact of the SEC’s recently adopted rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 on certain tax structuring and compliance matters for private funds, including after-tax clawback obligations, blocker and withholding taxes that are allocated to investors, and tax distribution loans and advances made by private funds to sponsors.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this edition of the Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight Series, Weil Tax partners Robert Frastai and Andrew Morris discuss the impact&#160;of the SEC’s recently adopted rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 on certain&#160;tax structuring and compliance matters for private funds, including after-tax&#160;clawback obligations, blocker and withholding taxes that are allocated to</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/features/chambers-expert-focus-weil-tax-insight-series-tax-implications-of-new-rules-under-the-advisers-act/">Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight Series: Tax Implications of New Rules Under the Advisers Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>State of the Union: President Biden Calls for Increase to the Excise Tax</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/state-of-the-union-president-biden-calls-for-increase-to-the-excise-tax/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Joseph Pari</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Grant Solomon</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=1842</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes a one percent excise tax (the “Excise Tax”) on the repurchase of corporate stock under Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 4501” and the “Code”, respectively) by a publicly traded U.S. corporation (a “covered corporation”) beginning after December 31, 2022. Much welcome guidance was released on December 27, 2022 in Notice 2023-2 (the “Notice”), which provides taxpayers with interim guidance until proposed regulations are issued. For purposes of the Excise Tax, the term covered corporation means any domestic corporation whose stock is traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of Section 7704(b)(1)). A covered corporation also includes any corporation that becomes a surrogate foreign corporation under Section 7874(a)(2)(B) after September 20, 2021. A repurchase of corporate stock by a covered corporation, to which the Excise Tax applies, generally includes (i) redemptions within the meaning of Section 317(b) and (ii) transactions determined by the Secretary of the Treasury or her delegate to be economically similar to a 317(b) redemption. The liability for any Excise Tax may be offset by stock issuances in the same taxable year or other exceptions detailed in the Notice.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes a one percent excise tax (the “Excise Tax”) on the repurchase of corporate stock under Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 4501” and the “Code”, respectively) by a publicly traded U.S. corporation (a “covered corporation”) beginning after December 31, 2022. Much welcome guidance was released on</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/state-of-the-union-president-biden-calls-for-increase-to-the-excise-tax/">State of the Union: President Biden Calls for Increase to the Excise Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>New IRS proposed regulation would reverse longstanding IRS ruling and upend commonly used real estate fund structures</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/new-irs-proposed-regulation-would-reverse-longstanding-irs-ruling-and-upend-commonly-used-real-estate-fund-structures/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Robert Frastai</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Hillel N. Jacobson</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Andrew Morris</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Lauren Gorsche</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=1816</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly before the new year, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) dropped a holiday bombshell on the tax community when it issued a proposed regulation under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”). The proposed regulation would, if enacted in its current form, reverse a longstanding IRS ruling interpreting FIRPTA (the “2009</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/new-irs-proposed-regulation-would-reverse-longstanding-irs-ruling-and-upend-commonly-used-real-estate-fund-structures/">New IRS proposed regulation would reverse longstanding IRS ruling and upend commonly used real estate fund structures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly before the new year, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) dropped a holiday bombshell on the tax community when it issued a proposed regulation under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”). The proposed regulation would, if enacted in its current form, reverse a longstanding IRS ruling interpreting FIRPTA (the “2009</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/new-irs-proposed-regulation-would-reverse-longstanding-irs-ruling-and-upend-commonly-used-real-estate-fund-structures/">New IRS proposed regulation would reverse longstanding IRS ruling and upend commonly used real estate fund structures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Notice 2023-2: Proposed Guidance on the Stock Buyback Excise Tax</title>
                        <link>https://tax.weil.com/insights/notice-2023-2-proposed-guidance-on-the-stock-buyback-excise-tax/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 14:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
                                                        <dc:creator>Devon Bodoh</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Joseph Pari</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Madeline Joerg</dc:creator>
                                                        <dc:creator>Grant Solomon</dc:creator>
                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://tax.weil.com/?p=1810</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes a one percent excise tax (the “Excise Tax”) on the repurchase of corporate stock under Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 4501” and the “Code”, respectively[1]) by a publicly traded U.S. corporation (a “covered corporation”) beginning after December 31, 2022. For purposes of the Excise Tax,</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/notice-2023-2-proposed-guidance-on-the-stock-buyback-excise-tax/">Notice 2023-2: Proposed Guidance on the Stock Buyback Excise Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes a one percent excise tax (the “Excise Tax”) on the repurchase of corporate stock under Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 4501” and the “Code”, respectively[1]) by a publicly traded U.S. corporation (a “covered corporation”) beginning after December 31, 2022. For purposes of the Excise Tax,</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tax.weil.com/insights/notice-2023-2-proposed-guidance-on-the-stock-buyback-excise-tax/">Notice 2023-2: Proposed Guidance on the Stock Buyback Excise Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tax.weil.com">Weil Tax BLOG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>